| |
| Welcome to myHanse.com the forum for Hanse Yachts owners throughout the world. | |
Yachting monthly video on 345 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Perttu
Captain
Joined: 13 October 2006 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 243 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Yachting monthly video on 345Posted: 04 January 2013 at 11:42 |
|
Check my sailing videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/l11483?feature=results_main
|
|
![]() |
|
Fendant
Admiral
Joined: 03 November 2012 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 1671 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 January 2013 at 23:19 |
|
Yes, indeed, and I think that the speaker hits some nails right on the head.
I am currently in the process to decide between a Hanse 345 and a Dufour 335.
a) The danger of slipping as shown is real, Dufour has put a Teak rail to exactly avoid that
b) The teak board doubling as grib for moving along the deck creates some doubts for me, a handrail like on the Dufour might be a better solution. In addition it looks funny and is a nest for dirt collection.
c) How do you quickly install the ladder on the Hanse bathing platform to get somebody who has fallen overboard in serious weather?
The fixed installed ladder on the Dufour seem to be the better solution
d) The accessability behind the control panels is neatly solved in the Dufour, the Hanse solution is less than IKEA standard.
e) The Dufour has a real clever chart table working area compared to the Hanse A3 size laptop holder platform.
f) The short handles at the companionway steps are ok for larger Europeans, Dufour has also thought for the shorter kind of customers below 1.8 m and has installed longer handrails.
Both do not have curved steps in the companionway ; cheap , useable probably on inshore lakes but dangerous in offshore. Not even antislip surface in the Hanse
Hanse ( in 2 cabin version ) on the other hand has the same or more brownie points in other features. It's still a tie situation for me. Dufour is clearly offering hefty discounts for the season 2013. Pre sales service is excellent from both boatyards :) ( ok I write French and German ).
I still don't get the final remark about the little hatch the speaker opens in the fore cabin and comments on the transducer accessability.
|
|
![]() |
|
Martin&Rene
Vice Admiral
Joined: 06 December 2009 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 967 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2013 at 09:38 |
|
The transducer he is talking about is the impeller unit for the speed log. In theory the manufacturers suggest we take it out and replace it with a plug if we are leaving the boat for a long period. In practice, most people only take it out if they think it needs cleaning. The problem he is showing is that on this yacht (which is of course the prototype hull 1), the small access hatch is not directly above the transducer and you would have to take up the small floor unit in the forecabin to pull the impeller unit. No big problem.
I was taught to always go down the boat on the windward side (and I generally do) and so you should never be thinking that a toerail will stop you going over the side. It was obviously of more significance when crews had to go onto the foredeck to change headsails, but most of us, particularly if you have a self tacker, do not do that anymore whilst we are sailing heeled. I have no practical experience on another of your points, but most advice is not to try and retrieve people over the stern in heavy weather as you risk getting them pushed under the boat suffering head injuries. You may find the "320 evaluation" article on the 320 forum an interesting observation.
|
|
|
Martin&Rene Hanse 341 Dipper Wheel steering, 3 cabin layout, normally based in Scotland
|
|
![]() |
|
Fendant
Admiral
Joined: 03 November 2012 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 1671 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2013 at 15:07 |
|
Thanks Martin & Rene,
No I understand his remark.
You are right, I have never removed the impeller, not even when lifting out for the winter.
This has cost me one new impeller. Otherwise I only remove it, when it gets stuck, but nowadays I simply switch to GPS speed as I never encounter tidal currents in my area. Flying is a different thing, there I still have triple redundancy from my pitot tubes
Getting a person overboard on deck again could open a very lengthy thread. I saw that Hanse had fitted a small flexible emergency ladder into the starboard stern, so they encourage a rescue ops via the stern. I think that the freeboard height nowadays does not give you another option besides having a rescue net for side haul out of the water.
All in all, I think that the 345 is great value for money especially in today's competitive environment.
Frank
|
|
![]() |
|
CharlesP
Admiral
Joined: 23 September 2010 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1208 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2013 at 22:59 |
|
I prefer to have a toe rail. There are always occasions when a crew needs to go forward and this will not necessarily be when under sail. A large sea will pitch you from side to side and the extra safety of a toa rail is appreciated. Also, when in a dinghy, the toe rail is useful to grab in various situations.
I always have a stern ladder fixed when cruising. If there is no stern ladder, it is easy to fit one of those plastic folding ladders which hook over the toe rail and held closed with some quick release cord from the water surface if you should unfortunately fall overboard. Charles |
|
|
'MERIDIAN LADY'
320 Nr 536 2010 Medway |
|
![]() |
|
Swanji
Captain
Joined: 28 March 2012 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 348 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 January 2013 at 19:03 |
Hi Fendant I think that your comparison is spot on terms of which boat to choose. Some thoughts 1. The Hanse 345 is not the lightest cruiser around at 6.2 tons versus 5.45 tons of the Dufour 335. However the H345 has a waterline length that is 0.5m longer so the D/L is similar on both boats . H345 is 202 versus the D335 of 208 2. The B/D ratio for the H345 is a good 32.7% versus 28.4%. Both have torpedo keels so the nod must go to Hanse 3. SA/D for H345 with standard ST jib is 16.6 versus D335 of 18.5. The Dufour is lighter and carries slightly more sail Both boats are very well set up for cruising with fantastic bathing platform, twin wheels, cockpit table etc. The H345 has an adjustable backstay, the D335 does not. The D335 has an innovative pad eye in the cockpit system with attachment points on the coamings, the Hanse does not. The Dufour has a brilliant removable bowsprit. Both boats will be awesome to sail and own. Design wise, the Dufour is possibly more classic while the Hanse is more aggressive contemporary but both are designed by very well respected NA. The Dufour has a no compromise chart table which I personally like versus the compromise on the Hanse. Just my opinion of course Let us know what you finally decide. Edited by Swanji - 21 January 2013 at 20:21 |
|
|
Onwards and upwards
Nidri, Levkada, Ionian, Greece Hanse 350 #7, SY Evolution, standard keel, 3YM20 sail drive, 3 cabins, cherry wood interior, teak decks, feathering prop |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Links : www.hanseyachts.co.uk www.hanseyachts.com www.fjordboats.co.uk www.dehler.co.uk www.varianta.co.uk |