Print Page | Close Window

Why is Hanse so expensive in its options?

Printed From: myHanse.com
Category: Hints & Tips
Forum Name: 345/348
Forum Description: 345/348 Hints, Tips and News
URL: https://www.myhanse.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8187
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 03:51
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Why is Hanse so expensive in its options?
Posted By: bigcat
Subject: Why is Hanse so expensive in its options?
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 00:08
We have started our quest for our perfect 34 footer and the Hanse 345 seems to fit the bill quite nicely.

Jeanneau just announced their new 349 which seems to share a lot of the features of the Hanse 345 including an (optional) self-tacking jib, double helms with all lines led aft, folding swim platform, chined performance hull, good creature comforts including a separate stall showed in the 2-cabin version, etc.
I would love to hear some discussion about these 2 boats, how they are expected to compare, etc. I say expected because the 349 won't be in the water until April I believe. Is having twin rudders an advantage?

I received pricing info on both the Hanse 345 and the Jeanneau 349 and what strikes me is the big difference in cost for an optioned out boat. A similarly optioned Hanse costs about $20K more and it seems to largely be due to the big difference in option cost.
Things like adding the B&G auto-pilot seems to cost 46% more on the Hanse. The swim platform costs 36% more, lazybag +67%, etc, also down to the cost of covers, although they can of course vary due to design differences.
The base price on the Hanse is higher too but the Jeanneau does not include the self-tacking jib out of the gate, so that reduces the difference a bit. However, out of the gate, the Jeanneau does include a slightly more powerful engine.

I just have to wonder if Hanse is pricing themselves out of the US market this way. We have not test sailed either boat, but the difference in quality, be it sailing quality or quality of materials has to be quite large to offset this.
The Hanse's seem to do quite well in Europe, so perhaps this pricing problem only exists in the US?
On top of things like list price, commissioning cost is pretty high too. As far as I can tell the Jeanneau at least initially will be built in France, so I would expect commissioning costs to be similar...




Replies:
Posted By: iemand
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 07:38
Is the Jeanneau produced in the US as well?

-------------
Hanse 312 MJ 2004 - Hanse 370e MJ 2007


Posted By: gertha
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 08:14
From my experience , which is 2006, so a little put of date. Hanse extras are a little over the top; but most can be retro fitted. I bought a fairly basic boat and upgraded myself. This saving a lot of money.
The difference between Hanse and the French boat , it is hard to see the similarities, it is obvious Hanse is vastly superior; but then this is a Hanse owner speaking so a little biased.
With reference to twin rudders , on a Volvo 70 they are essential ; but that is an out and out race boat with a massive transom. On a 34 foot boat they will give you more things to go wrong , less feel in the steering and suggest the design is pushing the nose down into wind and a single rudder cannot hold the water and stop her rounding up.
I am a little against twin rudders on a small boat as I had one, she would not sail into wind.
Again if they are speccing a bigger engine it suggests the sails are not up to the job, personally I would spec a smaller engine to save weight and improve sailing.
Only my thoughts, good luck either way.

Simon


-------------
Swanned off


Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 09:07
Hi Bigcat,
 
There are a few elements that I can help with here.
 
The Hanse has a hand built hull which costs considerably more than the faster, cheaper spray moulding technique preferred by the more mass produced options.  The result is a much more consistent laminate but more importantly the glass can be laid in strategic directions in relation to the forces on the hull and thus considerably stronger too.
 
The bulkheads are fully laminated to add further strength which again takes more time and thus costs more.
 
I agree that some of the options on the Hanse price list are over the top and we have a very good feel for what is good value and what is not having been dealers for many years.
 
The B&G Navigation Packs are extremely good value as it would be difficult to even buy all the parts for their fully installed price.  Somethings can be done less expensively by the dealer but probably not as many as you might think when it comes to looking at what is actually involved.
 
The stack pack for example can vary hugely in the quality of the cloth used.  Hanse used to use a much lighter cloth and the bag was cheaper but they only lasted a couple of seasons.  They now use a much heavier cloth.
 
Most models that have twin rudders these days also have a lifting keel option on their pricing and rather than develop 2 different steering systems for the relevant keel, they choose to do just one which has to work for whichever keel you choose.  With the lifting keel the twin rudders is essential as you would think.
 
All in all the Hanse is a more expensive yacht to build and thus the price is a slight premium but it is worth looking closely at each extra to see if it can be done better value elsewhere.
 
Kind regards
 
Phil


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: Fendant
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 12:11
Phil,
 
are you sure that Jeaneau is still using the chopper gun technique? I thought that most environmental laws in Europe is ruling this out. Spray moulding would result in a much heavier hull for the same laminate strength due to the lower fiber content inherent in this method.
 
I think that the twin rudders are a disadvantage when mooring in today's Marinas. You MUST have a bow thruster.
 
Just my 2cts
 
 


-------------
Frank


Posted By: iemand
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 12:51
As far as I know the 325 and 355 are also chopper gun products. I don't know about the 345

Twin rudder is very good for wide boats in the aft. Not just for lifting keels




-------------
Hanse 312 MJ 2004 - Hanse 370e MJ 2007


Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 14:07
Hi Iemand,
 
Just for clarity as it is very important to Hanse.  ALL of their hulls are built by hand apart from the 630 which is vacuum infused.
 
The final weight of the boat could be lighter when built by hand as opposed to the chopper gun method thanks to the additional strength but Hanse choose to layup heavily and reinforce heavily to create a very stiff and strong hull which is where the extra weight comes from.
 
Kind regards
 
Phil
 
 


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: richz
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 14:38
interesting thread.

Phil, do you also know what type of fiberglass is used in the lamination? is it woven roving or chopped map (or a combination)? also important would be to understand the glass content %

thanks, cheers


Posted By: iemand
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 14:46
All the smaller Hanses are made of solid laminate. Whether it's chopper gun or CSM Glas doesn't make a big difference. There are also chopper gun products with a low resin/glas ratio and therewith with low weight and good strength. The same way you can have hand laid laminates with a high resin/glas ratio. In this point there is no difference to a Jeanneau 349. Only the glas makes a boat strong and only thikness makes it stiff.

Sandwich laminates are for shure lighter and stiffer.


-------------
Hanse 312 MJ 2004 - Hanse 370e MJ 2007


Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 14:53
Hi Rich,
 
This is a good question.
 
There is a very little chopped strand mat in a Hanse as it has next to no real strength.  This type of mat is used in the very outer layers especially where there is a sharp angle or somewhere intricate to mould as it is far more malleable than either woven or multiaxial rovings.
 
The majority of the structural lay up is a combination of woven and multiaxial depending on the direction the majority of the stresses are felt.
 
As an example between the shrouds where the majority of the stress is athwartships Hanse will use mostly woven rovings as they have superb tensile strength.
 
In a part of the hull without any specific stresses they will use multi axial as this is the best "all rounder".
 
I have to say i don't know what the glass content is though
 
Kind regards
 
Phil


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: richz
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 16:06
Thank you Phil; well that is another good reason for justifying a bit of a premium on the price compared to other production boats.



Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 17:08
Thanks all for your replies and input. I think having an active user forum is a huge plus and a factor to take into account when purchasing a boat. We used to own a Catalina and the forums were extremely helpful when doing upgrades or fixing problems. This is very encouraging!

Phil, I will have to do some more research on differences in building techniques. But my main concern was about the cost of options, not so much about the base price difference of these boats. If you claim the B&G is such a good deal, why does it still cost 46% more than the exact same option on a Jeanneau (taking the B&G autopilot as an example)? Can you elaborate on what options would be better to skip and do aftermarket in your experience?

Frank, why are twin rudders a disadvantage in a marina?

How much should we expect commissioning to cost ? This is the first time we are looking at purchasing a brand new boat..



Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 17:49
Hi Bigcat,
 
These prices are off the top of my head so please excuse any errors
 
The Hanse Navigation Pack has the following items for a 345.
2 x B&G Triton displays with wind, speed, depth - Uninstalled are circa £1,300
1 x B&G 8" Zeus plotter - Uninstalled is circa £1,800
B & G autopilot - Uninstalled is circa £1,400
VHF Twin station VHF - Uninstalled is circa £550
GPS aerial - £300
Jefa DD1 drive for autopilot - £1,500
 
Total prior to installation is circa £6,850.  The pilot parts come to around £3,000 and the fitting is reasonably labour heavy.  There is no change out of around £3,800 from the local fitter here.
 
It will be possible to buy each element cheaper somewhere on line but for the purpose of explaining the Navigation Package price it helps to get a handle on it.
 
Maybe the big difference in the autopilot price is the use of the Jefa DD1 drive over a cheaper alternative.  The Hanse has a full Jefa steering system which have been brilliant over the years and great feel when sailing but they do require the use of their own drive which is not cheap.
 
The Uk commissioning pack price for a 345 which includes everything from antifouling to rigging, gas bottle, fire extinguishers, shore power lead, full day handover, launching, engine pre delivery checks etc is £5,207.
 
I would need to see the specification you are looking at to see what we would do as an aftermarket fit but this would vary on your delivery location and really your dealer is better positioned to offer this kind of advice as he may not be surrounded by the skills that we are lucky enough to have here.
 
I hope that helps a bit
 
Phil


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 18:51
Thanks Phil, I guess in some cases the difference must be installation cost and perhaps it is warranted. Hard to judge. In other cases perhaps Jeanneau, being part of Groupe Beneteau, can negotiate lower cost on equipment.

Commissioning here in California also seems to include trucking and wharfage. It's almost double the cost of what you quoted and that is on top of cradle and shipping charges to the US.

Well, I guess we will revisit this or start a new thread once the 349 arrives in April so we can discuss how the boats compare in real life. This should be interesting. Other boats we are looking at include the Dufour 335 GL, Beneteau Oceanis 34 and Bavaria Cruiser 33.


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 19:13
Iemand: I believe initial production of the J349 will be in France but they would consider moving it to SC.

Gertha: bigger engine was suggested as a must have by the local dealer here on SF bay.


Posted By: kweetje
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 20:14
We bought our 375 some years ago, and when discussing the price we got biggest discount on options... Maybe ask a quote for the boat you wish, with the options you wish an discuss price ?


-------------
First 4000 miles, no substantial problems


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 07 February 2014 at 22:17
Kweetje, we did get a quote and it ended up being $20K more than a similarly equipped J349. The B34 came in even lower but even without having sailed it I can tell the Hanse is probably a better boat. We are waiting for quotes on the other boats on our list but I have a hunch that the Hanse will be the most expensive.

We are trying to figure out if the price difference is justified.
We don't mind paying more for a better boat, but there is a limit.

In any case we need to test sail and I'm sure price is up for further discussion Wink


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 08 February 2014 at 07:38
Hi Bigcat, we also moved from a Catalina (a 320) which we liked very much, but wanted a small headsail on our next boat, which rules them out even though we were very happy with the overall build quality and fittings. 
 
On performance though, there is no comparison, the Hanse is just better and faster on all points of sail, and you can sail it singlehanded if you want to, which was much more difficult with the cataline (although of course not impossible). I think the 345 is pretty similar albeit a bit slower because of the size.
 
We went for the Hanse over the Jenneau/B boats because of the build techniques, but there were others on our list too.
 
Compared to the Cataline, some of the fittings are a bit lighter but these are easy to upgrade, and im not sure the others are any better until you get to the performance/racer cruiser bunch or like X yachts or the scandanavian boats, all of which are at another price level
 
Mark


-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 08 February 2014 at 08:49
hi Mark,

how funny, we used to have a 320 as well. She was our first 'big boat' (both me and my wife grew up sailing small boats), easy to maintain and upgrade and pretty reliable.
We sold her 5 years ago when our son was born and want something a bit more modern now. My wife especially wants a boat no older than 5 years. We like the Catalina 355 but it does not fit in the slip we are expecting to get. My 4 yo son wants a fast boat Smile
We need something in the 33-35 (max) feet LOA range.
I really like the 345 feature wise, have good hopes for its performance under sail and we like the interior.

I will do more research on build techniques, but the French boats are very popular in charter fleets and they seem to hold up pretty well. And between B and J I think the Jeanneau has a hull targeted at more performance.
How did you think the Hanse compared to a Jeanneau under sail?


Posted By: Peter-Blake
Date Posted: 08 February 2014 at 11:27
my 5 cents:

1. Many producers in the industrie have high prices for options. Look at Audi and you know what i am saying.....But i still drive a Audi, because i love it - not the price but the car!
2. Your advantage in sailboats is: Most of the option can be done by yourself in a later stage
3. Chines on many productionboats today are not really for more speed. Chines are only helpful for speed in high performance boats with a high speed range. Not so on cruisers! To me chines on cruisers  are something like a big spoiler on a VW Passat! The only advantage of the chines is a little more space for the aftercabins
4. On the "Boot" Düsseldorf i was on several diffrent brands (B;Del, Deh, J, Du, X-..) to my surprise i do not remember the really diffrence between the brands anymore. Some years ago i could tell you the diffrence... In the interior build quality the mass produced yachts are all in all very much the same today......Only X-Yachts i remember as it was a really good quality for much to much money. On Hanse i am a little bit biased as you could imagine, but i still feel the hulls are build in a strong quality.
4. Buying a boat is not only about price! Your wallet gives you only the general area for your investment.  There is a lot personal feeling about buying a boat! So you have to do your choice on the way you want to pay your money for and the way you want to sail. Following the Boot i would consider the follwoing list:

If you want to:

1. sail cheap (maybe you do not want to sail but just stay in the harbour....) and slow and want to have a charterlooking boat like a caravan and if you do not want to be recognized as the owner than buy a B (never write the complete word here!)
2. sail cheap with to many people in one boat and want to sail even slower than a B and you are a small grown man than buy a Delphia
3. sail cheap and fast as a Hanse and have a lot lot time to work on the equipment yourself (You´re the IKEA MAN) than buy a Varianta!
4. sail less cheap but only looking faster than a B but still  sailing slow as a B than buy a J!
5. sail for a reasonable price and sail fast and comfortable and still want to have a lot space below and want to have a well build hull and wonderful looking boat, than buy a Hanse!
6. sail for a less reasonable but still good price and sail only a very little faster and a little more sportive looking boat but with less space below than buy  a Dehler!
7. sail if money doesn´t matter and want to sail faster than a Dehler than buy a X-Yacht. But it will cost you 2-3 times the price of a Hanse.
8. sail if money doesn´t matter and want to sail really slow with an outdated in- and exterior than HR is your choice.

It is your choice!


-------------
Blake 370


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 08 February 2014 at 12:43
Hi bigcat , most of the boats in Dubai are B boats, we leave the oceanis for dead, not in the same league at all. We race regularly against the B firsts, and we are about the same speed as the 34.7s. They are a little shorter, but sail with carbon race sails and 135% Genoas, so they should be faster in lighter winds.

There are only a few Js here and they mostly cruise, but there about the same speed as the B oceanis. To be completely fair, we have a racey 105 genoa that we use when racing, iits not much bigger than the ST but it's stiffer, and we have modified the main sheet for 50 quid, see the photos in chit chat 'hanses in Dubai' thread. We have a big a2 for running, but the B firsts run symmetric poled spinnakers so they can go deeper, means we are sailing faster that the firsts but further. Our handicap is .996 and theirs is .998

However spread isn't everything. I like the Js coach roof shape, it look modern I think. The hanse is a bit more angular. They look sleek though because of th high side, low coach roof design.

-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: iemand
Date Posted: 09 February 2014 at 17:20
Hi Peter Blake, wh do yo think an X is faster than a Dehler? Dehler 38 and Xp38 is comparable.

-------------
Hanse 312 MJ 2004 - Hanse 370e MJ 2007


Posted By: Idelfix
Date Posted: 09 February 2014 at 17:55
Originally posted by iemand iemand wrote:

Hi Peter Blake, wh do yo think an X is faster than a Dehler? Dehler 38 and Xp38 is comparable.
 Hi i think Dehler is faster



-------------
"Keep sailing in free wind"

http://suhrfa.blogspot.se




Posted By: Peter-Blake
Date Posted: 10 February 2014 at 15:44
@idelfix:
1. You compare the Dehler 38 performance to the XP38. My thoughts about standart speed were going about the standart Dehler 38 (less Sailarea, less draft......). Than the X is faster for sure!

But
2. Following your numbers i think the X-Yacht is still faster.

look at the draft, that is the biggiest diffrence:
The more shallow draft keel (2.20 from the Dehler) has LESS!!!!! weight than the keel from the X-Yacht.

about 570 kg more and in addition 20 cm deeper that is a Number!!!!




-------------
Blake 370


Posted By: Idelfix
Date Posted: 10 February 2014 at 18:54
The XP(performance)38 and not the Xc38, is to compare with with the Dehler 38P don't you think.
The standard draft on XP 38 is 2.1 meter but this is a (on the paper race) 
Dehler beam is 5 cm more and less wight so the draft difrent don't do much to speed i think
The real race is still to com i think


-------------
"Keep sailing in free wind"

http://suhrfa.blogspot.se




Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 10 February 2014 at 19:09
All I know is that there is a very nice x 45 here that did the 75 mile offshore with us, and it was just FAST

I know I would like one, but I also know it's much more money than my Hanse.

-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: Martin&Rene
Date Posted: 10 February 2014 at 21:25
Going back partly to the original theme of this thread in that somebody was assessing what mid 30ft boat to choose, these are my thoughts from the London Boat Show, comparing the Jeanneau 349 and the Hanse 345.
The overall feel of the build quality inside was better on the Hanse.
If felt that the aim of the  349 was to make it a nicer apartment style interior;  hence the double doors into the front cabin.  However if you look at the practical side, I thought that the front cabin was smaller on the 349, with less storage space.  In the main cabin, there is no storage space above the seats, they just have a shelf which in the brochure shots has either a flower or an ornament on it?  The Jeanneau rep was showing somebody the storage space, behind the seats, but would you want to go behind the seat cushions every time you want a can of soup?
There is only a single sink on the 349, whilst the 345 has a double sink and that does make a lot of difference when you are preparing meals and washing up.  Again the 345 had less storage space in the galley than the 345.
Whilst the sail areas are nominally similar, this is if you have the overlapping jib on the 349.  If you opt for a self tacker, then the sail area on the 349 will drop and hence it will be slower. The 345 was designed from the start to have a self tacker. 
 
Hopefully, when you buy a boat you are going to have it for a long time, so really think hard about the sailing you are going to do.  It is not good to buy a boat, unless you are really comfortable with it, otherwise you will regret the choice for a long time. 
 

-------------
Martin&Rene Hanse 341 Dipper Wheel steering, 3 cabin layout, normally based in Scotland


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 02:10
Hi Martin & Rene,

great points, thanks so much!
We don't plan to do extensive cruising with the boat and our previous boat, a Catalina 320, didn't have much readily available storage either, but it's still a thing to look at.
Regarding the dual doors to the front cabin, it does seem to create the idea of more 'open' space, but in practice I wonder if one would keep them open or closed...defeating that purpose.

It is very helpful to point out these subtle differences that one may not immediately think about.
Keep them coming Smile

By the way, on the 345, where is the swim ladder stored? I believe on the 349 it folds inside the swim platform but on the 345 it does not?


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 02:34
Coming back too, one thing from the 320 you will miss is the big cock pit locker if you go for 3 cabins. We have 2 so we have somewhere for the fenders, buckets, swim ladder and so on. This is probably the same on both your choices though



-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 02:42
The double doors would be great when racing, we get our spinnaker bags stuck in the door all the time, it's a small issue, but I can see my frame and door will suffer if we race for long.

-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: Fendant
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 03:54
Big Cat,  the ladder on the 345 is stored in the starboard cockpit locker. If you want to rescue a person from the water, you first have to lower the stern platform , the open the locker, get the ladder out, unfold it and then on the open unprotected platform slot it into the two tubes. Imagine you have to do this in a seastate 5, chances that you loose the ladder and/or another person is imho close to 100%.
Having the ladder integrated into the platform is a BIG Clap plus for the Jeanneau ( also for the Dufour ) from a practical and a safety aspect.Shocked  Unfortunately you can not retrofit on a Hanse this important feature. The laminate in the platform is too thin and there is no easy way to reinforce it from the inside. The emergency ladder in the stern is a joke, don't think that even a circus acrobat will be able to climb it without help.
 
BTW, how is the solution on the BAV 37 now ?


-------------
Frank


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 07:35
better to drop the platform and throw a line with a loop in it (or a proper rescue line) and pull, it would be quicker than even the emergency ladder and more likely to succeed as long as the person in the water can pop it over his head.  I dont think I would bother with any ladder in a force 5 and i cant see how someone would get the ones stowed in the bathing platform out in a bouncy sea without potential injury either.
 
Having said all that its a pity that the ladder isn't stowed in the platform just better when going for a swim and no chance of letting go!


-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: Peter-Blake
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 08:33
My question has always been: Is a bathing platform a save platform at sea? I do not think so! Every higher wave will push the platform upwards. I would not step onto it in a strong wave situation.
The same goes to the hidden liferaftposition. Many boats (also Hanses) have the liferaft hidden behind the closed (upright) bathing platform. I would like to see a test in strong wind with strong waves and a sinking boat. How will it be with a constantly up and down-folding platform by waves?

Therfore:
I am happy not having a bathing platform!


BTW We are diverting from the topic....


-------------
Blake 370


Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 08:59
Hi All,
 
Just out of interest all current Hanses are fitted with an emergency pull out ladder on the transom which can be deployed easily by the person in the water if needed.
 
This is in addition to the bathing ladder
 
Kind regards
 
Phil


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: Fendant
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 16:08
Hi Phil,
 
has someone ever tried out this ladder? Or is it just to satisfy some stupid CE requirement?
 
I did try it out last summer and I had utmost difficulties to get on board in a mirror flat sea, it was impossible without help from above
 
 


-------------
Frank


Posted By: Yeoman
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 17:21
Hi Frank,
 
I would think it is to satisfy the requirements mainly and I have never tried to use one thankfully.
 
I really enjoy threads like this and it is important to remember that although the designers keep a close eye on the safety aspects of their designs this is not the only thing they consider when designing.
 
I would expect that if you were in a situation that sinking was a real prospect the raft would be out and launched ready.
 
Interestingly I was discussing this with a colleague who has sailed many many thousands of miles and he would not go for a coachroof mounted liferaft as he had it ripped off the deck of a Halberg Rassy in a storm and had watch it fly away!
 
I guess there is no perfect solution to anything but it is interesting to see what each builder does.
 
Kind regards
 
Phil


-------------
Inspiration Marine Group LTD - UK Importer for Hanse Yachts. Helping owner’s to get the best from their boats.


Posted By: Mark&Catherine
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 17:27
I might try the ladder for fun, the water is still warm here

-------------
385 ubulukutu sail number GBR 3350L in Turkey and Greece with Mark and Catherine


Posted By: samuel
Date Posted: 11 February 2014 at 18:39
Originally posted by Yeoman Yeoman wrote:

 
Interestingly I was discussing this with a colleague who has sailed many many thousands of miles and he would not go for a coachroof mounted liferaft as he had it ripped off the deck of a Halberg Rassy in a storm and had watch it fly away!
 
 
Phil

At last someone agrees with me.
I did make a comment on another post on this forum some years ago.
My coachroof is held in place with 6 screws. Perfectly OK for the job but totally inadequate once you add the weight of a liferaft
My liferaft sits under the mainsheet track in the cockpit where I have to step over the track so may as well step over the liferaft as well


-------------
Daydream Believer- Hanse 311- No GBR9917T- Bradwell Essex


Posted By: Martin&Rene
Date Posted: 06 March 2014 at 13:26
Going back to the original question, I have just seen a short review in Yachting Monthly and it made me look at the 349 brochure again and think about the actual basics of the boat.  Both the jib and main sheeting systems seem rather basic, with little purchase on the main and they are running jib sheets through Vectran rings.   The jib furling line has a horrible run and it will be tough to furl the jib.    
As mentioned before, it is really hard to look at a new boat and see all the small points that you are going to like and dislike through its long life.  Since you own a boat already, start by noting down at all the things you like and dislike on your boat and then look at the options.  The choice nowadays seems to be going more to "do you want a sailing boat?" (and I am happy with my Hanse) or "do you wanting a floating apartment?".   


-------------
Martin&Rene Hanse 341 Dipper Wheel steering, 3 cabin layout, normally based in Scotland


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 06 March 2014 at 23:59
Martin&Rene, where did you see the Yachting Monthly review? Was it online or in print?


Posted By: Martin&Rene
Date Posted: 26 March 2014 at 19:04
BigCat
 
We have been away for a few days.  It was only a mini review and I still have not seen a picture of a 349 sailing.  If you pm me your email address, then I will scan it and send it to you.
 
Martin


-------------
Martin&Rene Hanse 341 Dipper Wheel steering, 3 cabin layout, normally based in Scotland


Posted By: bigcat
Date Posted: 31 March 2014 at 06:47
hi Martin,

I'm sure there will be reviews coming in the next 2 months or so. The first 349 is expected to arrive at the local dealer in May. Unfortunately the local Hanse dealer only has big boats (415, 445 and 505) so our only chance at a 345 test sail is in SoCA or Europe (we'll be there in July). 
We test sailed a Dufour 335 GL today. The Dufour sailed very well I thought but the wife is not too keen about the interior. I thought it felt quite a bit smaller than some other boats of similar size, probably because it has a dedicated navigation seat. 
B is coming out with the Oceanis 35 (smaller version of the new 38) later this year. We test sailed the Oceanis 34 and I was not too keen about it. But I'm curious about the new 35.
It looks like all the major builders are going for twin wheels, self-tacker (at least as an option, which we don't feel very strongly about), folding swim platforms, lighter interior colors and more windows for more light inside.

I have not been able to figure out if there really is a big difference in build quality between these boats (B, J, Dufour, Hanse). 
 



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net