| |
| Welcome to myHanse.com the forum for Hanse Yachts owners throughout the world. | |
BAMAR Furler? |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
TAIMA
Commander
Joined: 14 April 2009 Location: Venezuela Status: Offline Points: 93 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: BAMAR Furler?Posted: 23 April 2009 at 23:07 |
|
Hi everyone, I wonder what experiences you all had so far with the BAMAR furling system on the 630, basically related to the mechanichs, construction, assembly and operation . I already have the second system on board (paid by Bamar) and the fourth torque tube!
Regards
|
|
|
Thomas Pollehne
Hanse 630/06 TAIMA |
|
![]() |
|
panos
Admiral
Joined: 02 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 April 2009 at 23:34 |
|
Hi,
We have no problems yet. Can you please describe how the first signs of failure appeared. Also what is the torque tube? Referring to the operation, the furler is weak and can only furl/unfurl the sail when completely unloaded, meaning we cannot furl it upwind if the sail is flapping. We have to sail shortly downwind and hide the jib behind the main. This is not a big problem and we got used in it. Edited by panos - 24 April 2009 at 23:51 |
|
|
Panos
Hanse 630e - selling her - |
|
![]() |
|
Peter-Blake
Admiral of the Fleet
Joined: 04 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 2471 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 April 2009 at 09:08 |
|
Hmmmm, a flapping jib is not possible to furl when the bow is in the wind?????
You have to sail downwind for that?
Seems to be really weak.
What do you do if you are close to the coast to leeward. You can get fast into danger.
|
|
|
Blake 370
|
|
![]() |
|
panos
Admiral
Joined: 02 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 April 2009 at 16:15 |
|
Hi,
Not really a problem. The same you would do to take down a spinnaker. Just needs some planning ahead. If we are close to the coast we can use the jib to sail a little bit upwind. I see no danger in that. The real danger can result if we cannot unfurl the jib to escape the coast in case of engine failure, but unfurling is less demanding on power and we can unfurl upwind. There is a manual mechanical override but is almost useless since you must really hand outside to engage it. |
|
|
Panos
Hanse 630e - selling her - |
|
![]() |
|
TAIMA
Commander
Joined: 14 April 2009 Location: Venezuela Status: Offline Points: 93 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2009 at 23:49 |
|
Hi Panos,
the furling power you can adjust on the Bamar control unit. Usually they adjust it from factory I think to only 50 Amps but you can go up to 100 easy and we even tried out 120 . This gives the power to fur in in "normal" conditions even going upwind but easing the sheets of course.
The real problem with Bamar starts if you need, for any reason, to reef the jib, like we had to do daily on our atlantic crossing as you would expect any other system to do. The whole asembly of the motor unit over the torque tube (the one that connects the motor with the headfoil) and the connection to the headfoil is very weak and only held together by small M6 stainless steel bolts cutted into aluminium. I will try to post some pictures but first have to learn how to reduce their electronic size. Our system started to fail the first time only 24 hours after leaving Greifswald and before passing the Kiel canal. The torque tube to headfoil joint just did not make it, it was a tube inside a tube held together by only M5 Allen screws. The second time it failed just off the english sw coast and we had to go into Scilly islands by night. There we fixed this as good as possible and reached Mallorca. In ;allorca Bamar staff came on board and changed the tube increasing the number and size of the screws. They came back a few weeks later to Laos to make the same repair on Hanse 630#11 gandul and checked out ours. Both systems on both our boats were totally damaged after the atlantic crossing in normal conditions, so BAMAR had to change them again.
The first signs you will see when you unfurl your sail and just check if all the screws are on place (torque tube- headfoil joint and on the lower side the torque tube to motor unit joint. Usually when the first one goes missing the next ones follow soon.
Again I will try to post pictures soon to make myself clear!
Regards
|
|
|
Thomas Pollehne
Hanse 630/06 TAIMA |
|
![]() |
|
panos
Admiral
Joined: 02 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 April 2009 at 18:19 |
|
Thanks Thomas,
I will inspect the torque tube this weekend and post some pictures. We try to avoid reefing the jib as instructed by North sails. We carry a storm jib instead, that can by hoisted on a removable inner forestay, but we never had the chance to use it until now. We use all the jib up to 24 knots true wind. At about 16 to 18 knots we takein the first reef and at 22-24 knots the second one. All above when sailing hard upwind. We never sailed upwind in stronger wind until now. The boat makes 9.5 to 10.5 knots speed and the apparent wind feels very stormy. It is also possible that the wind gauge is under registering the wind speed but I calibrated the instrument during a totaly windless night when the wind speed indicated was equalled to the boat speed and SOG registered by the GPS motoring to any direction. |
|
|
Panos
Hanse 630e - selling her - |
|
![]() |
|
panos
Admiral
Joined: 02 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2009 at 08:14 |
|
Hi,
It took a while to check. And ups.., three screws were missing and two more were broken inside. We replaced them all, not an easy job, but most probably saved the furler.
![]() THE FURLER TUBE (WE ARE HOLDING IT) WHICH CONNCTS TO THE DRUM (BELOW) BY A FEW M5 SCREWS.
![]() THE FURLER TUBE (AFTER REMOVING THE SCREWS) LIFTED OFF THE DRUM BELOW. THE HALF DESTROYED SCREW WINDINGS ARE OBVIOUS. NEW WINDINGS WERE CUT INTO THE ALUMINIUM.
![]() ANOTHER VIEW OF THE UPPER PART OF THE DRUM. ONE SCREW INSERTED IN THE WINDINGS FOR DEMONSTRATION AND TESTING PURPOSE.
Edited by panos - 08 July 2009 at 08:15 |
|
|
Panos
Hanse 630e - selling her - |
|
![]() |
|
Richard108
Captain
Joined: 02 October 2006 Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 July 2009 at 00:19 |
|
We have a 540 with a Facnor furler. So a different boat with a different furler, but perhaps similar problems. The stainless steel screws holding the joins in the foil were being sheared off we assume by the twisting motion when furling - perhaps made worse if the back stay or headsail halyard tensions had been loosening before foiling. We ended up replacing all the screws with larger ones and we now have the problem of them falling out even though they had been lock tightened in. Our current assumption is that the furler is undersized and cannot cope with the loads we put on it. Looking at the Facnor size recommendations shows that our furler is at the top end of the size recommendations for this length of boat, however we have a big rig for this size of boat. The next size up would appear better fit for a 540 Hanse. Perhaps the furlers on the 630's are undersized as well to cope with the loads that a Hanse puts on them. |
|
|
Regards Richard
("Moksha" 540 #115 delivered Sept 2007) Pittwater, Sydney, Australia |
|
![]() |
|
TAIMA
Commander
Joined: 14 April 2009 Location: Venezuela Status: Offline Points: 93 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 July 2009 at 15:14 |
|
Hi Panos,
I have been out for quite some time so did not check de blog for a while and just saw the pictures of your BAMAR System, its a deja vu, and I am sorry to say .." I knew it". Probably if you mostly sail in calm waters the problem will occur later but I see no technical reason for it not to occur.
The main problem here is that the power is transmitted from the engine over a torque tube to the headfoil. And all there is to transmit the force is a 4 mm spline and a few stainless steel screws cutted into aluminium. The problem is bigger if you sail your headsail reefed, as in that condition the full traction rests on the few screws and spline. Its just impossible that they hold. If you then furl and unfurl a few times a day , like on an atlantic crossing each time a squall shows, the system will be done after a short time. We had just one unbroken screw at the bottom and like 3 at the top of the torque tube after the crossing.
And beeing my boat the number 6, we still had the old model which was a round tube inside a round tube. They later changed this to a profiled torque tube .
In our case the system started to fail for the first time in the Kiel canal, after only 140 miles from Greifswald. We detected the problem and changed the screws on the upper end. For the second time all the screws were broken aand/ or fell of arriving at Scilly Island at the tip of England. we had to look for shelter there in tthe middle of the night and had to opeb new holes and put bigger screws in place. This held till Mallorca, where Bamar came to change the torque tube for the first time.
Back in Lagos in Portugal they came on board to recheck and to change the tube on the Hanse 630 # 11 GANDUL . After the crossing the thing went so bad that they had to change the complete Furler and they added the new version (profiled tube). Since then it is more or less OK, but we try not to reef in order to avoid too much stress on the system , but it definetely is not a product to cros oceans. It is a product to look nice on boats that do not sail much .
An other problem is, when you check their construction/mounting drawings, you will find out that there is no space between the screws attaching the torque tube to the engine and the turnbuckle holding the forestay. This space is so reduced that those screws hit the turnbuckle and act as a brake. In fact after installing the new system it was hardly moving until we found out that the screws were acting on the turnbuckle, so we had to remove those screws (delivered by BAMAR) and change them to a smaller size.
No wonder HANSE does not use the system anymore on the 630.
Regards,
Thomas Edited by TAIMA - 14 July 2009 at 15:16 |
|
|
Thomas Pollehne
Hanse 630/06 TAIMA |
|
![]() |
|
panos
Admiral
Joined: 02 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1939 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2009 at 18:07 |
|
Hi,
I dont see any clear reason why these screws unscrew. They should not get any load. The torque while furling/unfurling is taken by the shaft key, which is in perfect shape. Only while tensioning/untensioning the sail luff they could get some axial loads. My only explanation is that they get unscrewd because of extreme vibrations during tacking. By the way we never sail with partially reefed jib. We either unfurl it all or else we use the storm jib on the inner forstay. After many experiments during the Aegean rally we found that we have to reef between 18 to 20 knots true. We throw the second reef at about 25 knots and over 30 we change to the storm jib. More wind than 34 knots (true) we did not encounter. We made 8.2 to 9.5 knots close hauled and 11.5 to 12.8 if at around 60 degrees (true). Yes the 630 can plane on the waves. We need two waves to plane but then the speed climbs to 16.5 to 17 knots and stays there for long. |
|
|
Panos
Hanse 630e - selling her - |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Links : www.hanseyachts.co.uk www.hanseyachts.com www.fjordboats.co.uk www.dehler.co.uk www.varianta.co.uk |