| |
| Welcome to myHanse.com the forum for Hanse Yachts owners throughout the world. | |
Racing 470 or 461 |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
Peter White
Sub Lieutenant
Joined: 29 January 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 March 2007 at 11:43 |
|
Hi All
I am a new member and am enjoying all the advice & observations from John & others on the forum. Bill, it sounds like we are in a very similar position. This thread especially interests me as I too am still yet to make a decision on a new yacht, I thought I had made a decision on a new 470, I went to our recent sail expo down here in Sydney, our first look in the flesh at a new 470 & then I looked at a new Beneteau Oceanis 50 whilst there, not really what I am after, I would prefer a more performance oriented boat, but the quality of finish was far better than I remember from a few years ago and that got me rethinking things. I think the level of detail & finish is better on the Beneteau then the Hanse. Got talking to the Benetau rep and then heard about the new First 50, I researched that over the net & I am very impressed with this boat, First Series have always been performance oriented and the contemporary interior fit out really appeals to my wife and I. The specs & numbers seem similar between 470 & First 50. The reason the 470 origially appealed to us was her inherant performance design, ease of sailing short handed and her contempory fitout below. I raced 2 tonners way back for a number of years, so still have the desire to have a performance boat, that I can club race, whilst still being able to comfortably take the family, we have 2 small children 9 & 7, along for weekends etc. This thread has made me rethink things again, I had started to head more towards the First 50, I am now more open minded again. I am heading out for a test sail on the 470 either next week or the next, the first of the Beneteau First 50's arrives in Sydney next month, at which time I will naturally go for a test sail on that also. I would appreciate any further debate on the pros & cons of each that anyone has to offer, especially related to the performance of each and how the 470 might be tweaked, especially given its lack of optioned dedicated spinnaker winches or another location for 2nd primary winches. Our local dealer is heading over to Hanse next month & is going to ask how this issue may best be overcome. Look forward to hearing further on your thoughts Bill after further research. cheers Peter |
|
![]() |
|
Singapore Bill
Lieutenant
Joined: 06 March 2007 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 March 2007 at 15:05 |
|
Hi Peter,
Thanks for chiming in on this. I am riding on the same fence re: 470e vs First50.
While the First50 is meant to be a cruiser/racer and somewhat IRC-based in design a couple of things really bug me about the design. These include:
1) no traveller on the mainsheet - how can you race a 50-footer w/o a traveller?! not sure what the Bene boys were thinking here;
2) mainsheet winch stuck in the middle of the cockpit - this means your trimmer's weight is inboard for any trimming - not good in heavier air;
3) position of primaries and mainsheet winch - your jib trimmer and main trimmer are going to hate each other after racing because they'll be banging into each other every single tack - why Bene put these in-line athwart-ships is beyond me;
4) mast height - too short - don't know if Bene have a taller performance rig (carbon even?) - maybe you know?
Apart from those I quite like the First50 and I'm very intruiged by your comments on build quality.
What I'm struggling with now is the absence of coachroof winches and traveller on the 470e and how to rectify this. The shorthanded capabilities of the 470e are immensely appealing though I must admit.
I'd be very interested to hear what you have to say after test-sailing both yachts.
Thanks again - let's stay in touch!
Cheers,
Bill
|
|
![]() |
|
Peter White
Sub Lieutenant
Joined: 29 January 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 March 2007 at 01:42 |
|
Hi Bill
I think you are right with some of your observations and have commented again in your reponses below: 1) no traveller on the mainsheet - how can you race a 50-footer w/o a traveller?! not sure what the Bene boys were thinking here; - I guess it was the compromise between cruise/race, although I agree with you 100%, I will ask our local guys for a comment back from Bene 2) mainsheet winch stuck in the middle of the cockpit - this means your trimmer's weight is inboard for any trimming - not good in heavier air; - Also true, can't get him on the rail thats for sure, but I would probably put up with it for club racing and the better ability for short handed if I went with the 50. 3) position of primaries and mainsheet winch - your jib trimmer and main trimmer are going to hate each other after racing because they'll be banging into each other every single tack - why Bene put these in-line athwart-ships is beyond me; - Also agree, in an attempt to make the boat easy for short handed control they have failed here, should have the primaries futher forw, it certainly will require some discipline on the part of both trimmers to get a system going that avoids each other. 4) mast height - too short - don't know if Bene have a taller performance rig (carbon even?) - maybe you know? - Specs call up nearly same height as 470 for aluminium & the carbon rig is larger. Standard rig has larger main area and much large jib area than 470, even I suspect with 140% on 470 & if it can be sheeted properly, the Bene has about same or larger jib at 70m2. Total sail area with stand rig they quote as 139m2 against 124m2 for 470 albeit with only the 105% jib. What I'm struggling with now is the absence of coachroof winches and traveller on the 470e and how to rectify this. The shorthanded capabilities of the 470e are immensely appealing though I must admit. - I am going to sail & see quality of both back to back, talk further to both reps about pro's & con's and wait for their possible suggestions for mods at overcoming the issues on both boats. Will keep in touch. cheers Peter Edited by Peter White - 17 March 2007 at 01:46 |
|
![]() |
|
Singapore Bill
Lieutenant
Joined: 06 March 2007 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 March 2007 at 05:09 |
|
Hi Peter,
Agree with your comments and thanks for posting.
I guess for mixing racing and cruising the First50 is better laid out with obvious "issues" (but far and above a better yacht when considering proper spin handling straight out of the factory) and headsails (forgot to mention the recessed furler is A-ok in my book on the F50 also).
If the F50 had electric winch controls port and stbd on both rails the main trimmer could ease & trim from the rail (big ask I'm guessing and more holes in decks).
Who is the Hanse dealer that you're dealing with in Australia? I've rcv'd a luke-warm response from the dealer in SE Asia (Phuket). I asked if he had the polars for the 470e 2 weeks ago and he's gone silent on me. At least these are posted on the First50 page - would sure like to compare them (even though most of the time MFG'r polars are complete BS).
Good luck with your test sails. Hope you get reasonably similar conditions for both.
Cheers,
Bill
|
|
![]() |
|
Peter White
Sub Lieutenant
Joined: 29 January 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 March 2007 at 07:15 |
|
Hi Bill,
Very good dealer down here, Windcraft Yachts at Bayview in Sydney, link below, I speak to Damien he is very knowledgible and helpful, he is the one going to the Hanse factory in April & whom is asking questions on my behalf. I agree that furler below deck line is very cool & neat. http://windcraft.com.au/default.html cheers Peter |
|
![]() |
|
Singapore Bill
Lieutenant
Joined: 06 March 2007 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 March 2007 at 08:16 |
|
Thanks - great website.
|
|
![]() |
|
John Allison
Rear Admiral
Joined: 23 November 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 March 2007 at 08:52 |
|
Hi Guys,
Can only comment from pictures and specs - and certainly seems the 'standard' Beneteua 50 has cabin top winches.
But stangely note it also has an iron keel?????? So whilst the deck layout might better suit a race crew - have to wonderif they'd have to sit back and watch the 470 storm to windward higher / faster?
Would be very interested to hear back once someone has completed a comparative sail on both both boats.
JOHN
|
|
|
No longer a Hanse owner - but loved the one we had!
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard108
Captain
Joined: 02 October 2006 Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 March 2007 at 10:04 |
|
Hi Bill I note that the Hanse 470's displacement (12,200 kg) is significantly lighter than the Beneteau 50 (13,780 kg). In light winds when sailing close hauled the larger sail area of the Beneteau 50 at first appearance looks like the beneteau would be a better performing Yacht. However when looking at the displacement per square metre of sail area the boats are much closer. The Hanse 470 has a displacement of 10.16 kg per square metre of sail area and the Beneteau 50 has 10.06 kg.
|
|
|
Regards Richard
("Moksha" 540 #115 delivered Sept 2007) Pittwater, Sydney, Australia |
|
![]() |
|
Singapore Bill
Lieutenant
Joined: 06 March 2007 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 March 2007 at 11:39 |
|
That ratio is one way of looking at it, yes. But there are several other factors involved. The two most important/impactful of these are:
- where the weight is located (ie. with a carbon rig and a deep draught keel the Bene50 would probably outpace the 470e as centre of effort would be substantially lower)
- sail configuration/material - how easy is headsail change - potential for light air sails? - I like the potential for Code-0 on the 470e though (see John Allison's pix on this in another thread - woohoo!) - somehow can't envision a huge asso code-0 on a Bene... hmmm.
Pittwater eh? Nice. That's where I got my Sydney40 from. Great harbour and great atmos at RPA.
Cheers,
Bill
|
|
![]() |
|
Richard108
Captain
Joined: 02 October 2006 Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 March 2007 at 21:38 |
|
Bill
Pittwater is great but I feel confined and long for the open sea. Can't wait to get my 540 in June.
Have you seen the Carbon mast on the 531 - see links below? Apparently you can charter this Carbon masted Hanse in One of the reasons I selected a Hanse over many other boats I looked as was the size of the beds. I love to sail fast and in the open sea but a decent bed is a must. Double beds with little room for too peoples legs (like the First 50 aft cabins) and a main cabin bed that is short on width at the pillow end (like the First 50) leaves me no place to sprawl out on a warm night. The Hanse 470 from what I can see has bigger beds than the Beneteau 50. Edited by Richard108 - 19 March 2007 at 21:47 |
|
|
Regards Richard
("Moksha" 540 #115 delivered Sept 2007) Pittwater, Sydney, Australia |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Links : www.hanseyachts.co.uk www.hanseyachts.com www.fjordboats.co.uk www.dehler.co.uk www.varianta.co.uk |